Forgive, dear Reader, my lack of attention. There’s been a distraction, you understand. Yes, soccer. Watching the games, I find myself reaching for the mute button on the remote a lot. Mainly when the commentary gets irritating. And also that monotonous vuvuzela racket. But it was not always thus.
The kudu horn has a more solemn intonation. And fewer decibels. The man who gave us the vuvuzela is a 37 year Capetonian called Neil van Schalkwyk, who has sold 800 000 of them, including an order for 40 000 from Sainsbury’s in London. He now also makes a slightly less noisy version, but will the cheap Chinese vuvus be so too? Sadly, Van Schalkwyk was unable to patent his invention. After all, the horn has been around for a while:
I actually like the vuvuzela. It stands for African spontaneity and ebullience. But Mondli Makhanya‘s point – that we’ve replaced songs like Shosholoza with a plastic cacophony- is true. Go to a game with 50 000 of those at full blast? No thanks, I’ll be watching at home. Sticking close to the mute button.




1 comment
Comments feed for this article
23/06/2010 at 20:50
Judy Norton
The “traditional horn” has a shiny new plastic incarnation which I saw for the first time last night on the teev – a “kuduzela” I believe its called. I also like the vuvuzela if I am in the room watching the game on tv and maybe will like it tomorrow night at game we are going to. But from a distance in the house, say, reading in another room…. aaaargh!